Cybersecurity Education

About
Lenavqes

A platform built around one problem: most business teams have no reliable way to test or reinforce cybersecurity knowledge before an incident forces them to.

Cybersecurity training environment at Lenavqes

What this platform is

Lenavqes started in 2021 as a direct response to a gap in how organizations handle internal security awareness.

Most corporate training stops at a slide deck. Employees sit through a presentation, click through a compliance checklist, and move on. Nothing tests whether the knowledge sticks under pressure.

This platform takes a different approach. Every module is structured as an interactive quiz or scenario-based test — the kind of format that surfaces gaps in understanding rather than just confirming someone was present.

The content covers phishing recognition, access control decisions, incident response judgment, and vendor risk — specific situations business teams actually face.

4+ Years of active content development

12 Core cybersecurity topic areas covered

38+ Countries with active registered teams

Lead Strategist

Ostap
Verhola

Cybersecurity curriculum architect and platform lead

Ostap spent eight years working in enterprise network security before shifting focus to education. His primary concern at Lenavqes is that quiz scenarios reflect genuine attack vectors — not hypothetical ones. He reviews every new module before it goes live and maintains the platform's content update schedule.

The team around him includes instructional designers, security analysts from outside Ukraine, and a small group of developers who maintain the quiz engine and scoring logic.

Interactive quiz interface used in Lenavqes training sessions

Team working on cybersecurity scenario development

How the platform works

Select track

Run quizzes

Review gaps

Repeat cycle

Scenario-based testing

Each quiz presents a realistic business situation — a suspicious email, an unusual login request, a vendor asking for system access. Participants choose from concrete options, and the platform records not just whether they got it right, but how long the decision took.

This timing data often reveals more than the answer itself. A correct answer reached after 40 seconds of hesitation tells a different story than one answered in 6.

Scenario-based cybersecurity quiz screen

Feedback that names the problem

After each answer, participants receive an explanation tied to a specific threat category. Not "incorrect — the right answer is B," but a brief description of what the attack type was, why the wrong option was plausible, and where the reasoning typically breaks down.

Team managers receive a summary report showing which threat categories produced the most errors across their group. That data is available after each completed quiz cycle, not just at the end of a course.